Overall result for ZCT 104, semester II, Sessi 2004/05**
Effective
number of students taking the course: 361
Grades |
No. of
students |
percentage
(%) |
|
|
|
TH |
1 |
0.3 |
F |
7 |
1.9 |
D- |
20 |
5.5 |
D |
30 |
8.3 |
D+ |
45 |
12.5 |
C- |
46 |
12.7 |
C |
70 |
19.4 |
C+ |
57 |
15.8 |
B- |
28 |
7.8 |
B |
16 |
4.4 |
B+ |
22 |
6.1 |
A- |
10 |
2.8 |
A |
10 |
2.8 |
total |
362 |
100.3 |
C- and
below |
149 |
41.3 |
average |
44 |
STD Deviation |
13.4 |
% of STD
Deviation |
30.35 |
General comment on the result: |
In comparison to last
year’s ZCT 104 which was excellently fair and reasonable (less than a few
percents students scoring C- and below), this year performance is considered
as terribly poor. The main reason for this marked discrepancy is due to the
fact that I have placed strong emphasis in the understanding of the concepts
rather than calculations. Objective questions are designed in such a way to
test students understanding rather than their memorization skill. I suspect
that this is the main reason (at least one of the major reasons) why lots of
students have done poorly as some still cling on to the bad habit of
memorization of formulae rather than exercising their intellectual faculty to
comprehend the core concepts. In addition, the overall
performance of students in this year’s ZCT 104 is not satisfactory
considering the fact that the marking scheme has been relaxed tremendously
for the benefit of the poorly-performing students. Else we would expect
roughly an 10% rise in the students scoring C- and below. (Sigh!) Maybe it is no coincident
that the distribution curve of this paper
is very similar to that of ZCA 101 offered in semester I the same
academic year. Most of the students taking this course also took the ZCA 101.
Hence the overall result of the ZCA 104 reflects the possible fact that the
same pool of students who scored poorly in the ZCA 101 (C- and below) still
have not improved in their skill of study in ZCT 104. |
Remedial
suggestion: Practice
more exercises. You must read text books in order to understand the physics
concepts that are heavily emphasized in this paper. The understanding of the
art of how to solve physics problems can be acquired though persistent and
continual practice. Nurture the habit to learn up the art of thinking and
logical deduction. |
|